<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Statistics on timerring</title><link>https://blogs.timerring.com/tags/statistics/</link><description>Recent content in Statistics on timerring</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blogs.timerring.com/tags/statistics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>How Many Samples Does It Take to Trust a Batch?</title><link>https://blogs.timerring.com/posts/how-many-samples-does-it-take-to-trust-a-batch/</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 12:00:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://blogs.timerring.com/posts/how-many-samples-does-it-take-to-trust-a-batch/</guid><description>&lt;p>You have 1,000 items, but testing every one of them is expensive. How many should you randomly inspect: 10, 100, or half the batch?&lt;/p>
&lt;p>There is no universal answer based on population size alone. As the &lt;a href="https://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/prc/section2/prc22.htm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook explains&lt;/a>&lt;sup>&lt;a href="#ref-link-1" class="footnote-ref" id="ref-link-back-1">[1]&lt;/a>&lt;/sup>, sample-size planning depends on the statistical objective and precision requirements. The useful question is: &lt;strong>How many items do I need to estimate a proportion with a chosen level of precision?&lt;/strong> Under common assumptions, the answer is 278—not an arbitrary percentage of the batch.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>